Counselling is often voluntary, but in some contexts it is mandated by employers or ordered by the courts. This approach is not positioned as a matter of preference but as a structured requirement, either for workplace compliance or as part of judicial processes. Understanding when and why counselling services in Singapore become compulsory allows individuals and organisations to navigate their obligations with clarity.
Workplace-Mandated Counselling
Employers may require employees to undergo counselling in situations where performance, behaviour, or safety is at risk. For instance, staff involved in repeated workplace conflicts may be referred to counselling as part of disciplinary or corrective action plans. Employees in industries with high safety demands, such as construction, aviation, or maritime operations, who exhibit signs of stress, substance misuse, or unsafe conduct may be directed to seek counselling before being allowed to return to duty. Counselling services are also mandated in some organisations as part of Employee Assistance Programmes (EAPs), where participation is compulsory after some incidents, such as harassment complaints, accidents, or breaches of conduct.
Counselling in Cases of Workplace Misconduct
Counselling may be part of the remediation process once employees are investigated for misconduct. Employers may impose it to address behavioural issues linked to aggression, dishonesty, or breaches of ethical standards. Rather than terminating employment immediately, some organisations incorporate counselling into a corrective strategy. This session is often documented in employment contracts, workplace policies, or collective agreements, giving employers the authority to enforce counselling sessions in response to misconduct. Counselling services, in such cases, function as a tool to align employees with workplace norms and reduce the risk of recurrence.
Court-Mandated Counselling in Criminal Cases
The courts can require counselling as part of sentencing or rehabilitation. Offenders in cases of domestic violence, substance abuse, or juvenile delinquency may be directed to attend counselling sessions conducted by approved service providers. The aim is to address behavioural or psychological issues that contribute to offending. For example, the Family Justice Courts often mandate counselling for perpetrators and victims of family violence under the Women’s Charter, ensuring both accountability and support. Similarly, youths placed under probation may be ordered to attend structured counselling programmes as part of their rehabilitation conditions. Non-compliance with these requirements can result in legal consequences, including penalties or escalated sentencing.
ALSO READ: How to Control Anger Problems? A Guide to Mastering Your Emotions
Counselling in Divorce and Family Proceedings
Counselling, in family-related cases, is commonly mandated to support dispute resolution and protect children’s welfare. Couples undergoing divorce may be required to attend mandatory parenting programmes or counselling sessions before proceedings can advance, particularly if custody of children is contested. The Family Justice Courts often direct parties towards counselling to explore reconciliation or to create workable co-parenting arrangements. Counselling services in Singapore are therefore integrated into the legal process to reduce conflict, encourage cooperation, and safeguard minors affected by family breakdowns.
Court Orders in Cases of Abuse or Protection
Victims and offenders in cases involving protection orders may also be required to attend counselling. For example, individuals subject to Personal Protection Orders (PPOs) may be directed to counselling programmes designed to prevent further abusive behaviour. Counselling is not optional in such contexts; it is embedded in the enforcement of protection measures. This approach ensures compliance with court directives and provides structured intervention for parties involved in repeated conflict or violence.
Implications of Mandated Counselling
Mandated counselling differs significantly from voluntary participation. Attendance is monitored, records may be reported back to employers or courts, and failure to comply can result in employment termination or legal penalties. Individuals required to attend counselling services should therefore treat it as part of a formal process rather than a discretionary choice. While confidentiality is generally upheld, mandated counselling may involve reporting obligations, which clients must understand before commencing sessions.
Conclusion
Counselling services in Singapore are not always voluntary. Employers may impose them in cases of workplace misconduct, safety risks, or disciplinary procedures. Courts mandate counselling in criminal rehabilitation, divorce, and family-related proceedings, as well as in protection order cases. These requirements place counselling firmly within legal and organisational frameworks, making attendance an enforceable condition. Mandated counselling, for those affected, is a structured obligation tied directly to compliance with employment or judicial processes.
Contact My Inner Child Clinic to ensure structured, confidential, and legally compliant support tailored to mandated requirements.
